Saba vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Saba

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 23% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
SabaQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.30$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.016
Context window33K1M
Max output26K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers—1
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-02-172026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Saba or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 23% cheaper than Saba on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Saba vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Saba: 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Saba ≈ $700.00, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons

Saba vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSaba vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSaba vs Command A+Saba vs GPT-6 Luna ProSaba vs GPT-6 LunaSaba vs GPT-6 Sol ProSaba vs GPT-6 SolSaba vs Claude Opus 5.5Saba vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedSaba vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSaba vs Grok 4.7Saba vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSaba vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSaba vs GPT-6 AstraSaba vs GPT-6 Astra ProSaba vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5