MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Arcee Ai

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Arcee Ai
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 32% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.1 vs 10.8). MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashTrinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output524K80K
Intelligence index29.110.8
Coding index—25.8
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-04-01
Retirement—2026-10-26

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Trinity Large Thinking?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 32% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons