MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 4.6× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.45
Output price / 1M$0.60$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$1.21
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M128K
Max output524K16K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index—22.1
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 4.6× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons