MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Sonar
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.7× cheaper than Sonar on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 127K).
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Sonar | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.14 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.28 | $1.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $1.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0028 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 127K |
| Max output | 131K | 114K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 2 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 99.9% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-01-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Sonar?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.7× cheaper than Sonar on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Sonar: which has a bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Sonar: 127,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Sonar ≈ $2,500.
More comparisons
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Sonar vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSonar vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSonar vs Command A+Sonar vs GPT-6 Luna ProSonar vs GPT-6 LunaSonar vs GPT-6 Sol ProSonar vs GPT-6 SolSonar vs Claude Opus 5.5