MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
Q
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.28$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.36
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.05
Context window1M262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index18.2
Coding index41.9
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons