MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.26 / $1.56
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Xiaomi
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.3× cheaper than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.26
Output price / 1M$0.28$1.56
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.58
Cached input / 1M$0.0028
Context window1M1M
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.6%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-02-16
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.3× cheaper than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 ≈ $1,300.

More comparisons