MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Plus

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.65 / $3.25

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Qwen3 Coder Plus
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.65
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$3.25
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$1.30
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	$0.13
Context window	1.1M	1M
Max output	131K	66K
Intelligence index	26.7	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	8	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2025-09-23
Retirement	—	2026-10-09

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7.4× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Plus: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Plus: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 Coder Plus ≈ $2,925.

More comparisons