MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.12 / $0.80

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 40% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Qwen3 Coder Next
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.12
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$0.80
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$0.29
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	$0.07
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	131K	236K
Intelligence index	—	9.2
Coding index	—	36.2
Providers	2	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	99.9%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-02-04
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 40% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 Coder Next ≈ $640.00.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Qwen3 Coder Next

Cost calculator

FAQ

More comparisons