MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.66 / $1.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.66
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$1.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$0.74
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	—
Context window	1M	33K
Max output	131K	29K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	2	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	99.2%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-09-21	2024-11-11
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons