MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.36 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
Q
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.36
Output price / 1M$0.28$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.37
Cached input / 1M$0.0028
Context window1M33K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212024-09-19
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1× cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ≈ $920.00.

More comparisons