MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs o1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
O

o1

OpenAI
$15.00 / $60.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
O
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 150.0× cheaper than o1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
MiMo-V2.6-Flasho1
Input price / 1M$0.14$15.00
Output price / 1M$0.28$60.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$26.25
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$7.50
Context window1M200K
Max output131K100K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—39.7
Providers2—
Best provider uptime (30m)99.2%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212024-12-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or o1?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 150.0× cheaper than o1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs o1: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. o1: 200,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, o1 ≈ $60,000.

More comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)o1 vs GLM 5.3 Primeo1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Primeo1 vs Command A+o1 vs GPT-6 Luna Proo1 vs GPT-6 Lunao1 vs GPT-6 Sol Proo1 vs GPT-6 Solo1 vs Claude Opus 5.5