LongCat 2.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

LongCat 2.0

Meituan
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 4.8× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. LongCat 2.0 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (19.1 vs 12.9). LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
LongCat 2.0Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.08
Output price / 1M$1.20$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.006$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output262K131K
Intelligence index19.112.9
Coding index45.326.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-202026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, LongCat 2.0 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 4.8× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

LongCat 2.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons