LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.3× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| LongCat 2.0 | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.52 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.006 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 19.1 | — |
| Coding index | 45.3 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, LongCat 2.0 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.3× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Command A+LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 LunaLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 SolLongCat 2.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLongCat 2.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 AstraLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5