LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.0× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| LongCat 2.0 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.52 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.006 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 19.1 | — |
| Coding index | 45.3 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, LongCat 2.0 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.0× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
LongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Command A+LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 LunaLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 SolLongCat 2.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLongCat 2.0 vs Grok 4.7LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLongCat 2.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 AstraLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5