Llama Guard 4 12B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 10% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs 131K).
Llama Guard 4 12BNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window164K131K
Max output16K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoNo
Released2025-04-302026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 10% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons