Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.72 / $0.72
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.1× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.72$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.72$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.72$0.23
Cached input / 1M—$0.02
Context window131K1M
Max output8K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index——
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2024-07-232026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.1× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ≈ $1,800, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons