Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.72 / $0.72
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 4.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.72
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.72
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.72
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K131K
Max output59K8K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-062024-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 4.2× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ≈ $1,800.

More comparisons