Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.72 / $0.72
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
MiniMax
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.72$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.72$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.72$0.26
Cached input / 1M—$0.015
Context window131K1M
Max output8K524K
Intelligence index—29.1
Coding index——
Providers—11
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2024-07-232026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ≈ $1,800, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons