Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.72 / $0.72
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 22.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.72
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.72
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.72
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M131K
Max output128K8K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072024-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 22.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ≈ $1,800.

More comparisons