Ling 3.0 Tiny vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Tiny

inclusionAI
$0.015 / $0.045
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Xiaomi
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 7.8× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 TinyMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$0.015$0.14
Output price / 1M$0.045$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$0.0225$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.003$0.0028
Context window262K1.1M
Max output250K131K
Intelligence index—26.7
Coding index26.5—
Providers—8
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-062026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Tiny or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Ling 3.0 Tiny is 7.8× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Tiny vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons