Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 95.2× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.021$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.063$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.0315$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0042$0.25
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index45.4
Coding index50.676.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-232026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 95.2× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons