Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 7.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.021$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.063$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.0315$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.0042$0.016
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index50.6
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-232026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 7.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons