Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 76.2× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 262K).
Grok 4.7Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M$1.60$0.021
Output price / 1M$4.80$0.063
Blended price (3:1)$2.40$0.0315
Cached input / 1M$0.40$0.0042
Context window500K262K
Max output450K33K
Intelligence index46.4—
Coding index—50.6
Providers4—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 76.2× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons

Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5