Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 254.0× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.021
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.063
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.0315
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.0042
Context window1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index57.6
Coding index50.6
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-07-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 254.0× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons