Ling 3.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 5.6× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Ling 3.0 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.021 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.063 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0315 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0042 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 50.6 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-23 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash is 5.6× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLing 3.0 Flash vs Grok 4.7Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLing 3.0 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5