Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.46 / $1.82
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 25.3× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Ling 3.0 FlashQwen3 235B A22B
Input price / 1M$0.021$0.46
Output price / 1M$0.063$1.82
Blended price (3:1)$0.0315$0.80
Cached input / 1M$0.0042—
Context window262K131K
Max output33K8K
Intelligence index—9.5
Coding index50.6—
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-232025-04-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 25.3× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Qwen3 235B A22B ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons