Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.46 / $1.82
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 235B A22B is 20.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 9.5). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 235B A22B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.46
Output price / 1M$40.00$1.82
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.80
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M131K
Max output128K8K
Intelligence index64.69.5
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072025-04-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Qwen3 235B A22B is 20.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3 235B A22B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Qwen3 235B A22B ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons