Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.07 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
NVIDIA
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 3.3× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 FlashNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.021$0.07
Output price / 1M$0.063$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.0315$0.10
Cached input / 1M$0.0042$0.04
Context window262K262K
Max output33K236K
Intelligence index—5.5
Coding index50.626.8
Providers—5
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-232026-08-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 3.3× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $240.00.

More comparisons