Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.07 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 156.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 5.5). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.07
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.10
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index64.65.5
Coding index—26.8
Providers55
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-08-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 156.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $240.00.

More comparisons