Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA
$0.05 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
N
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 2.8× cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 FlashNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.021$0.05
Output price / 1M$0.063$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.0315$0.0875
Cached input / 1M$0.0042$0.03
Context window262K262K
Max output33K236K
Intelligence index8.9
Coding index50.614.4
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-232025-12-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 2.8× cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ≈ $200.00.

More comparisons