Ling 3.0 Flash vs Llama Guard 4 12B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Meta Llama
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 5.7× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
Ling 3.0 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B
Input price / 1M$0.021$0.18
Output price / 1M$0.063$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.0315$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.0042
Context window262K164K
Max output33K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index50.6
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-07-232025-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Llama Guard 4 12B?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 5.7× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.

More comparisons