Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.32 / $1.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 6.2× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (25.2 vs 24.6). Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.7 Plus
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.32
Output price / 1M$0.18$1.28
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.56
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.064
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.625.2
Coding index5755.9
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-06-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 6.2× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.7 Plus: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Plus: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.7 Plus ≈ $1,280.

More comparisons