Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.26 / $2.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 7.9× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 15.6).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.26
Output price / 1M$0.18$2.08
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.72
Cached input / 1M$0.012
Context window262K262K
Max output33K66K
Intelligence index24.615.6
Coding index5745.7
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-02-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 7.9× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ≈ $1,560.

More comparisons