Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs o3 Mini High

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
O

o3 Mini High

OpenAI
$1.10 / $4.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
O
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 21.4× cheaper than o3 Mini High on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 11). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 200K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLo3 Mini High
Input price / 1M$0.06$1.10
Output price / 1M$0.18$4.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$1.93
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.55
Context window262K200K
Max output33K100K
Intelligence index24.611
Coding index5716.3
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102025-02-12
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or o3 Mini High?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 21.4× cheaper than o3 Mini High on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs o3 Mini High: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. o3 Mini High: 200,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, o3 Mini High ≈ $4,400.

More comparisons