Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Mistral Small 4

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Small 4

Mistral AI
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 2.9× cheaper than Mistral Small 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 11.3).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMistral Small 4
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.015
Context window262K262K
Max output33K210K
Intelligence index24.611.3
Coding index5726.6
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-03-16
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Mistral Small 4?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 2.9× cheaper than Mistral Small 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Mistral Small 4: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Mistral Small 4: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Mistral Small 4 ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons