Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral AI
$0.40 / $2.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 8.9× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 9.2). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMistral Medium 3.1
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.40
Output price / 1M$0.18$2.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.80
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.04
Context window262K131K
Max output33K105K
Intelligence index24.69.2
Coding index5720.5
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102025-08-13
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 8.9× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Mistral Medium 3.1: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Mistral Medium 3.1 ≈ $1,800.

More comparisons