Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 33.3× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 14.2).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMistral Medium 3.5
Input price / 1M$0.06$1.50
Output price / 1M$0.18$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.012
Context window262K262K
Max output33K210K
Intelligence index24.614.2
Coding index5746.9
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 33.3× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons