Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Ministral 3 3B 2512

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Ministral 3 3B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.10 / $0.10
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 10% cheaper than Ministral 3 3B 2512 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 4.8). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMinistral 3 3B 2512
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.10
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.10
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.01
Context window262K131K
Max output33K105K
Intelligence index24.64.8
Coding index574.8
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102025-12-02
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Ministral 3 3B 2512?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 10% cheaper than Ministral 3 3B 2512 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Ministral 3 3B 2512: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Ministral 3 3B 2512: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Ministral 3 3B 2512 ≈ $250.00.

More comparisons