Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiniMax M2.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.8× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 22.8). Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window (262K vs 205K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMiniMax M2.7
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.18$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.06
Context window262K205K
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.622.8
Coding index5752.6
Providers9
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-03-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiniMax M2.7?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.8× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiniMax M2.7: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons