Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Xiaomi
$0.43 / $0.87
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
X
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 6.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (26 vs 24.6). MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.43
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.87
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.54
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.0036
Context window262K1.1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.626
Coding index5760.2
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-04-22
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 6.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $1,305.

More comparisons