Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
MiniMax
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 4.2× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash SanteMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.042$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.12$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.0623$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.0084$0.015
Context window262K1M
Max output33K524K
Intelligence index—29.1
Coding index——
Providers—11
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-042026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 4.2× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262,144 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante ≈ $145.60, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons