Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M2.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.8× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.8 vs 22.6). Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has the larger context window (262K vs 205K).
Ling 3.0 Flash FinMiniMax M2.7
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.18$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.06
Context window262K205K
Max output236K131K
Intelligence index22.622.8
Coding index55.652.6
Providers9
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-272026-03-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or MiniMax M2.7?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.8× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M2.7: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens. MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00, MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons