Kimi K2.6 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 19.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27 vs 24.6).
| Kimi K2.6 | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.95 | $0.06 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.71 | $0.09 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | $0.012 |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 236K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 27 | 24.6 |
| Coding index | 61.8 | 57 |
| Providers | 22 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2026-09-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 19.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.6 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.6 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Opus 5.5