Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.8× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Kimi K2.6 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.95 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.71 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 236K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 27 | — |
| Coding index | 61.8 | — |
| Providers | 22 | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.8× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.6 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5