Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10.1× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Inkling | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.05 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.76 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 472K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 25 | — |
| Coding index | 52.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Inkling or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10.1× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Inkling: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Inkling ≈ $4,025, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Inkling vs GLM 5.3 PrimeInkling vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeInkling vs Command A+Inkling vs GPT-6 Luna ProInkling vs GPT-6 LunaInkling vs GPT-6 Sol ProInkling vs GPT-6 SolInkling vs Claude Opus 5.5Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedInkling vs Grok 4.7Inkling vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashInkling vs GLM 5.3 FlashXInkling vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashInkling vs GPT-6 AstraInkling vs GPT-6 Astra ProInkling vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5