GPT-6.1 Terra vs Inkling
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Inkling is 12% cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (51.3 vs 12.5). GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 524K).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $4.05 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $1.76 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | $0.17 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 524K |
| Max output | 128K | 472K |
| Intelligence index | 51.3 | 12.5 |
| Coding index | — | 52.1 |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2026-07-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Inkling?
Inkling is 12% cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Inkling: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Inkling ≈ $4,025.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProInkling vs Gemini 4 CarbonInkling vs Claude Fable 5.2Inkling vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashInkling vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashInkling vs Hy4Inkling vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalInkling vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProInkling vs Kimi K3.1 Pro