Inkling vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Inkling is 2.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.5 vs 12.5). Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 524K).
| Inkling | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.05 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.76 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.20 |
| Context window | 524K | 1M |
| Max output | 472K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 12.5 | 46.5 |
| Coding index | 52.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 23 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-17 | 2026-10-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Inkling or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Inkling is 2.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Inkling vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: which has a bigger context window?
Inkling: 524,288 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Inkling ≈ $4,025, Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
Inkling vs Gemini 4 CarbonInkling vs Claude Fable 5.2Inkling vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashInkling vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashInkling vs Hy4Inkling vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalInkling vs GPT-6.1 TerraInkling vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProInkling vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashInkling vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Inkling vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLInkling vs Gemini 4 ArgonInkling vs Claude Haiku 5.5Inkling vs Nano Banana 2.1Inkling vs Mistral Large 4Inkling vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro