Claude Fable 5.2 vs Inkling

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Thinkingmachines

Inkling

Thinkingmachines
$1.00 / $4.05
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Thinkingmachines
Verdict: Inkling is 9.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 12.5). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 524K).
Claude Fable 5.2Inkling
Input price / 1M$8.00$1.00
Output price / 1M$40.00$4.05
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.76
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.17
Context window1M524K
Max output128K472K
Intelligence index64.612.5
Coding index—52.1
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-07-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Inkling?

Inkling is 9.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Inkling: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Inkling ≈ $4,025.

More comparisons