Inkling vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 19.6× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Inkling scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (25 vs 24.6). Inkling has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Inkling | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.06 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.05 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.76 | $0.09 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.012 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 472K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 25 | 24.6 |
| Coding index | 52.1 | 57 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-17 | 2026-09-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Inkling or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 19.6× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Inkling vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?
Inkling: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Inkling ≈ $4,025, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
Inkling vs GLM 5.3 PrimeInkling vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeInkling vs Command A+Inkling vs GPT-6 Luna ProInkling vs GPT-6 LunaInkling vs GPT-6 Sol ProInkling vs GPT-6 SolInkling vs Claude Opus 5.5Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedInkling vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashInkling vs Grok 4.7Inkling vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashInkling vs GLM 5.3 FlashXInkling vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashInkling vs GPT-6 AstraInkling vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Opus 5.5