Inkling vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 7.7× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Inkling has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Inkling | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.05 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.76 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 472K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 25 | — |
| Coding index | 52.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Inkling or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 7.7× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Inkling vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Inkling: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Inkling ≈ $4,025, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Inkling vs GLM 5.3 PrimeInkling vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeInkling vs Command A+Inkling vs GPT-6 Luna ProInkling vs GPT-6 LunaInkling vs GPT-6 Sol ProInkling vs GPT-6 SolInkling vs Claude Opus 5.5Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedInkling vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashInkling vs Grok 4.7Inkling vs GLM 5.3 FlashXInkling vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashInkling vs GPT-6 AstraInkling vs GPT-6 Astra ProInkling vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5